What is the Future of Williams?

February 18, 2010

Someone recently submitted an anecdote to the Tall Bike Tales museum talking about how he remembers when there were only one or two other commuters back in the day on his commute along North Williams, a popular route for cyclists in N and NE Portland. I, too, remember those days.

So as I rode my commute home yesterday, this was going through my mind, coupled with a recent BikePortland article. Bikers were everywhere, and many were on each other's rear wheels, jostling for position, trying to get ahead and ride our preferred paces. I was thinking about how crowded that route is these days, and then all of a sudden I was at a complete stop, wheels behind me were screeching to a halt. It all happened so fast I was sure someone was going to go down (no one did), and I'm sure I heard some grumblings from the pile-up behind me.

I shook myself out of my "Future of Williams" daze to realize we had only stopped to let a pedestrian cross the crosswalk. Certainly an admirable move on the part of the biker who first stopped. But with the way we were all hanging on each other's back wheels, it was kind of a mess. And I don't blame that guy who stopped for the ped, in fact, I applaud him.

But it got me to even further thinking. As more cars got on the roads, we started to have to put in devices and laws to help people stay safe because people weren't thinking for themselves and didn't know how to navigate the streets without some suggestions.

We can do better than that. We're smarter now, more advance, as a transportation society. As more people transition to choosing their bikes as a way to get around, I would hope they'd bring some of their driving and walking knowledge (as well as some smarts) to the street. I don't drive on someone's rear tire, I don't scoot my car around another by dangerously whipping out into traffic for a second.

It's interesting, this new conundrum! What is the future of Williams? I'm excited for all this riding, but it seems like we need to start promoting smart RIDING and perhaps to further inform people of the side street options for those who don't want to ride in the pack. Williams is the freeway; streets like neighboring Rodney are the local route.

Keep riding, have fun, enjoy this great weather and set the tone for a cordial riding environment. After all, what's the rush?

Posted by orbike at February 18, 2010 9:31 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.eroidelivers.com/bins/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1216

Comments

Hey Ayleen,

I agree Williams deserves some special attention. Yesterday I tweeted about an idea I'm kicking around to do an event based on getting people together to talk about all the bike issues on Williams. If we do that event, I hope you bring this to the table. Stay tuned!

Posted by: Jonathan Maus / BikePortland.org at February 18, 2010 9:51 AM

I agree! i ride this all the time and I used to just crank up it but now with more people, i am realizing that I need to be more cautious, ride more carefully, and really, I agree, what's the rush? I mean, I WANT to get home after work, but lately I've really been enjoying the commute, also.

Posted by: Janna at February 18, 2010 11:30 AM

Great article - I think this issue is starting to crop up all over the city (Hawthorne Bridge, Waterfront Park, for instance), and it's going to take some realizing for certain people that they act the same way on a bicycle as the "drivers" they rail against (most of whom are just other regular people who want to get from point A to point B).

I think this makes a good argument for separated infrastructure too, as I feel a lot of the impetus for riding quickly is that we feel a need to keep up with auto traffic - even when you're in a bike lane, on a busy street like Hawthorne or SW Broadway, you don't really feel at ease to just kind of toodle along with 30mph traffic rushing by you a foot or two away. Separated paths, like the path on the Hawthorne Bridge or the Cycle Track on Broadway give a whole different feeling, and I think the average rider feels the ability to kind of chill out and take it easy more than they would riding on the road. Obviously, some people just like riding quickly, and that's fine (as long as they do it respectfully), but I think many people ride faster than they would otherwise because they feel the need to keep up with traffic.

I think some good education effort would be welcome too, something good and positive (as opposed to "hey jerks, slow down!") - on both riding and parking (you know those people who park their bike with their helmet locked to it and crooked so it takes up three spots, and then falls over when you try to put yours in the rack?).

We'll get there eventually, it's just growing pains.

Posted by: Dave at February 18, 2010 11:40 AM

I share your concerns about safe riding and etiquette on crowded routes like Williams. I think we're dealing with bike congestion on an otherwise unprecedented level in the United States. Hopefully we'll get some nice infrastructure on this route, but we also need to deal with the culture of riding with lots of other cyclists.

This video was inspired in part by my experiences on Williams during rush hour: http://bozz1.com/link/passnext

Posted by: Steve B at February 18, 2010 12:36 PM

I share the concerns as well as the excitement! Sharing the road means sharing it with our fellow cyclists. I am frustrated by the aggro nature of some cyclists - so angry, why? #SlowDown is THIS what Team Super Relax is all about?

Posted by: Suneil at February 18, 2010 1:16 PM

Good post! Bikers should follow the "3 second rule" like we learned in driver's ed...not that many drivers practice this.

Posted by: Erin at February 18, 2010 5:45 PM

In the short term I'd like to see Sharrows on the right lane of Williams.

Even though it's just more paint on the ground it would at the very least set the expectation with all road users that cyclists will be using more than just the bike lane.

Posted by: Benjamin Foote at February 18, 2010 5:56 PM

This is an excellent article and brings up valid points. Williams (and Vancouver) have on street parking and two lanes of traffic, yet all the cyclists are riding in a 3ft lane. Now there's the anti-car thought that parking or traffic should be reduced to create more room for bikes which has been done on the Hawthorne Bridge. (I'm sure there are city employees who have looked into this) Then there's the school of thought which considers other options. I find that the vehicle traffic as close as it is to be unsettling, so I take Rodney going both north and south (or sometimes MLK late at night). Either of these ideas or a combination can be looked at to help address this.

Posted by: Aaron at February 18, 2010 8:05 PM

While I understand people have concerns about aggressive riders--I have to admit I haven't had any memorable bad incidents with any cyclists and I have done about everything by bike since I got here almost 9 years ago. I find Portland riders to be overwhelmingly courteous and congenial. And I certainly don't see a problem with passing or being passed, even though it means someone must leave the bike lane for a moment.
What I do have a major problem with on Williams, however, is not other cyclists, but the way we are forced to navigate buses pulling in and out of the bike lane, cars cutting across the lane to park and leave parking and the omnipresent "dooring" issue. I would much rather focus on these issues, then other cyclists, particularly since this is the route my young teenagers take to and from school. Any plans to focus on this now that the federal grant money appears to have fallen through?

Posted by: Diana at February 18, 2010 9:02 PM

Janna,
Thank you for the article. I just finished reading the WW's article on the BTA and I think you have touched upon the one thing that the article did not. Rider responsibility. I am a biker and I drive a small Civic, so I know the frustrations on both sides. I come from California where the bike laws are very clear and you stand an equal chance of getting a traffic ticket as a motorist does and it goes on your driving record. Six years ago when I moved to Portland, I discovered a different attitude about bikes and pedestrians. Portlanders have an attitude of ownership without responsibility as if to say,"It's my road and if I have a right to be out in the middle of traffic without concern for my safety or others, it's everyone else's responsibility." The laws seem to be very vague and the idea of not stopping at a stop sigh if there is no traffic, will mean to many that they don't have to stop at all. I am not a black and white kind of person, but it seems to me that when it comes to public safety, we as a biking community should be educators of safety and advocates of clear and safe laws. Blurring the lines only allows for the line of safety to be pushed back and for more human damage and conflict between drivers and riders. By the way, I think that the green bike boxes are stupid. Relying on infrastructure and not relying on your own awareness of your surrounding is lazy and dangerous. I for one don't use them and feel safe because I make eye contact with drivers whenever I am at a stop. I'll stop my rant now. Thanks for the time and opportunity to be read. Tom

Posted by: Tom Beardman at February 21, 2010 1:42 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?